You've read thousands of student essays.
Trust that instinct — then document it.

Everything you need to understand a writing process

• Full revision timeline — every edit laid out chronologically
• Paste detection & paste log — flagged with timestamp, character count, and novelty score
• Session history — date and time the student opened and worked on the document
• ⚡ Struggle moment detection — regions where the writer cycled through deletions and rewrites in the same place
• Revision playback — watch the document being written from the first character
• 📊 Process View report — a printable, observational PDF summarising sessions, paste activity, struggle moments, and five research-cited writing-process metrics. Form fields for student/assignment/course are filled in the browser before printing — no transmission.
• Activity flags — unusual patterns automatically surfaced

Seven metrics. Research-backed. Entirely private.

The question StyleMatch answers: does this submitted piece of writing carry the same stylistic fingerprint as a known sample by the same student? Inspect describes the writing process; StyleMatch compares two pieces of writing.

• Grammatical Function Words — Burrows' Delta over 30 core function words; among the most stable authorship signals in computational stylistics
• Discourse Marker Profile — Burrows' Delta over 29 connectives & stance markers; reflects reasoning habits
• Punctuation Fingerprint — comma, semicolon, dash, colon, !, ? rates per 1,000 characters
• Avg Sentence Length — characteristic length that persists across writing tasks
• Sentence Rhythm (SD) — standard deviation of lengths; captures varied vs. uniform rhythm
• Type-Token Ratio — vocabulary range; interpreted cautiously across different text lengths
• Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level — reading complexity; stable across tasks for the same writer
• Pairs naturally with Inspect's Process View report — together they answer how was this written and does it sound like them
• All computation runs locally — no text ever transmitted
• Minimum 500 words per sample required

Two reports. Ten dimensions. One conversation.

• Consistency Report — analyses a single essay in 29 chunks across Register, Vocabulary, Sentence Complexity, Argument Depth, Error Density, and Cohesion. Produces a heatmap and writer baseline profile.
• Baseline Deviation Report — compares submitted work against a controlled sample across 10 dimensions: Function Word Distribution, Orthographic Habits, Punctuation Micro-Patterns, Syntactic Complexity, Syntactic Patterning, Cohesive Device Profile, Error & Mechanics Fingerprint, Nominal vs. Verbal Style, Phrase Recurrence, and Lexical Diversity.
• Each dimension rated: Anomalous / Notable / Within Range
• AI-generated recommended next steps and suggested follow-up questions for the student conversation
• Research citations included — 10 peer-reviewed sources
• Printable PDF report with Report ID for institutional records
• No text retained after analysis is complete
• Tokens never expire — use them when the situation calls for it

The essay generates its own defense

The question Oral Defense answers: can the student account for the choices in their own essay — out loud, in their own words, two weeks later? A genuine writer can talk about why they wrote what they wrote.

• Generate — paste or auto-fill the essay; AI drafts ~10 questions about authorial choices: why this example, why this conclusion, why this structure (1 token)
• Curate — you are the gatekeeper: keep 4–6, edit any, add your own
• Send — the student gets a private link; no account, no app (1 token)
• Defend — each question is hidden until it's read aloud, then 10 seconds to prepare, then recording starts — one take, up to 2 minutes
• Report — per-question markers (✓ accounted for · ◐ brief · ⚑ couldn't account · — not answered), evidence from the transcript, and suggested follow-ups
• Transcripts + on-demand audio playback in your dashboard
• Audio permanently deleted on export (or 30-day backstop); report kept 90 days

What Write gives you that a shared Google Doc doesn't

• Timed sessions — set a duration; students see a countdown; the window locks on expiry. No extensions without a deliberate teacher action.
• Join-code access — students join via a short code, no account needed. Teachers control who can submit and when.
• Paste detection — every paste event is logged with a timestamp, character count, and whether the content was subsequently deleted.
• Focus-loss tracking — if a student leaves the writing tab, the duration and timestamp are recorded in the process log.
• Student transparency — a mandatory, non-skippable screen tells students exactly what is and isn't captured before they begin writing.
• Session reports — on submission, the teacher receives the full essay text alongside a structured process log. Reports can be downloaded as ZIP.
• No student accounts — students never register or log in. Nothing is stored beyond the teacher's download window.
• Plain text, no assistance — spell check, grammar check, and autocorrect are all off. Students write without AI-augmented support.